Global Outcry Over Cancellation of Religious Event in South Korea

The abrupt cancellation of a significant religious event in Paju, South Korea, has ignited a global controversy, prompting accusations of religious discrimination and violations of constitutional rights. The "Religious Leaders Forum and Graduation Ceremony," scheduled for October 30, was expected to draw over 30,000 participants from 78 countries before being canceled by the Gyeonggi Tourism Organization (GTO) just hours before its commencement.

The decision has led to a joint protest statement signed by 402 organizations, 758 religious representatives, and 977 individuals worldwide, totaling 1,735 signatories. The statement condemns the cancellation as an act of biased religious oppression through public power, emphasizing the psychological and financial damage caused to international participants.

The controversy centers on the GTO's last-minute cancellation of the venue rental, citing security concerns related to North Korean activities. However, event organizers allege that pressure from opposing groups, including vested religious interests, influenced the decision. This claim is supported by the fact that other events in the same area proceeded without disruption during the same period.

The incident has raised serious questions about religious freedom in South Korea, with protesters arguing that the cancellation violates Article 20 of the South Korean Constitution, which guarantees freedom of religion. The joint statement demands an official apology from the Gyeonggi Provincial Government and the GTO, as well as disciplinary actions against responsible officials and improvements in venue reservation procedures.

The global response to this incident has been swift and widespread. Over 88 international leaders, including law experts, religious figures, and journalists, have sent official documents and protest letters to the Republic of Korea. These communications express shock at the administrative action and demand prompt measures to address the situation.

This controversy highlights the delicate balance between security concerns and religious freedoms, and its resolution could have significant implications for South Korea's international reputation and its commitment to constitutional rights. The incident serves as a reminder of the importance of transparent and fair administrative processes, especially in matters concerning fundamental freedoms and international events.