KeyCrew Media, a real estate intelligence and media company, is meeting with members of Congress and their staff in Washington, D.C., as part of the News/Media Alliance’s 2026 Support Journalism Fly-In. The company is joining more than 220 participants from news, magazine, and digital-only publishers to press for legislation that protects how journalistic content is used by AI companies.
KeyCrew Media licenses its own content broadly, including to AI platforms. Its support for stronger protections can seem surprising at first, but the company sees no conflict. Its argument is that every publisher should have the legal right to decide how its work is used, whatever that decision turns out to be.
The fly-in has two purposes. Participants are celebrating the congressional champions of the news industry, and they are meeting with lawmakers to reinforce the need for legislation that supports quality journalism. KeyCrew’s focus in those meetings is clear rules for how AI companies can use publishers’ content. The company is a strong advocate of properly defining how content is used, distributed, and consumed by AI platforms. That position comes from its own business: KeyCrew’s model rests on a legal framework that governs what the company and third parties can and cannot do with its reporting.
According to Steve Marcinuk, Co-Founder and CEO of KeyCrew Media, the issue is not that AI companies use news content. The issue is how some of that use happens. “There’s a real risk right now that large tech companies are using information without proper licensing, building solutions on the back of work done by local organizations, with no compensation, no oversight, and no responsibility,” said Marcinuk. Many AI platforms were built and trained on content that was not properly sourced. Publishers now face the question of how to enforce their preferences going forward. “How individual publications set up and enforce their rights over what can and can’t be done with their content is a technology question, in terms of putting the right solutions in place to prevent scraping,” said Marcinuk. “But it’s also a legal one, and that part is of great importance.” Technology can help block unauthorized scraping, but it cannot settle who has the right to decide. That is where legislation comes in.
KeyCrew is more open about AI use than many traditional publishers. Marcinuk says that openness is a choice, and that the ability to make that choice is exactly what the fly-in is meant to protect. “We’ve made a conscious choice to be very open about where our content can be used and distributed. We’ve spent a lot of time, energy, and money setting up the right legal framework to make that possible, including licensing to AI companies and other downstream partners,” said Marcinuk. “But let’s not confuse concepts. That is us expressing our choice for what is done with our content, the same way other publications should be able to enforce their rights about what can and can’t be done with theirs.” He also pushes back on the idea that publishers seeking protections want to shut AI out entirely. Many of the publishers KeyCrew has met through the News/Media Alliance already license content to AI companies. They do so with legal structures in place and with clear terms on how the content is used, how it is displayed, and how they are compensated. “It’s not the case that every publisher is trying to completely block their content from appearing in AI in every form or being used in training. Far from it,” said Marcinuk. “But they are having thoughtful conversations about how their content will appear, and they have every right to do so.”
More people now get information through AI platforms, and AI companies are consuming more content than ever. Marcinuk sees this as the moment for media companies to be at the center of decisions about how their content is and is not used. The outcome matters beyond publishers’ revenue. When local organizations cannot control or be paid for their work, fewer of them can afford to keep producing it. That affects publishers, and it also affects “their readers, their subscribers, and their ability to operate well into the future,” Marcinuk said. For KeyCrew, which interviews local experts across hundreds of real estate markets and provides that coverage to publishers filling gaps in their local reporting, a healthy media ecosystem is part of its own foundation. Clear legal protections give every publisher the ability to choose its own path with AI, whether that means broad licensing like KeyCrew’s or tighter limits.
KeyCrew Media is a real estate intelligence and media company that interviews thousands of expert sources to produce forward-looking market insights, distributed across a growing network of publications and syndication partners. This article is based on information provided by the expert source cited above. It is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or real estate advice. Readers should conduct their own research and consult qualified professionals before making any real estate or financial decisions. Disclosure: Individuals or companies mentioned may have a commercial relationship with KeyCrew.
