Build a lasting personal brand

Ninth Circuit Rules 'Eleanor' from 'Gone in 60 Seconds' Not Copyrightable, Impacting Replica Builders and IP Law

By Advos

TL;DR

The Ninth Circuit's decision in Carroll Shelby Licensing v. Halicki opens opportunities for replica builders by limiting copyright overreach on iconic cars like Eleanor.

The court ruled Eleanor from Gone in 60 Seconds lacks copyright protection due to insufficient narrative role and distinctive traits, unlike the Batmobile.

This ruling fosters creativity and innovation by ensuring iconic film props remain accessible for homage and replication, enriching car culture.

Eleanor, the famed Mustang from Gone in 60 Seconds, is legally just a prop, not a character, as decided by the Ninth Circuit.

Found this article helpful?

Share it with your network and spread the knowledge!

Ninth Circuit Rules 'Eleanor' from 'Gone in 60 Seconds' Not Copyrightable, Impacting Replica Builders and IP Law

The Ninth Circuit Court's recent ruling in Carroll Shelby Licensing v. Halicki, declaring that 'Eleanor'—the iconic Mustang from 'Gone in 60 Seconds'—is not a protectable character under U.S. copyright law, has significant implications for intellectual property law and the automotive replica industry. J. Baron Lesperance, an IP attorney known as The Patent Baron™, praised the decision, stating it underscores the principle that aesthetic appeal alone cannot warrant copyright protection.

Lesperance, who specializes in patents, trademarks, and licensing, emphasized the court's distinction between 'Eleanor' and characters like the Batmobile, which possess consistent features and a narrative role. This ruling is pivotal for replica builders, as it limits the ability of rights holders to monopolize film props, thereby fostering a more open environment for legitimate reproductions.

The decision also serves as a reminder for creators and brands to adopt a layered approach to intellectual property protection. Combining copyright, trademarks, and trade dress can provide more comprehensive safeguards for creative works and brand assets, potentially avoiding expensive legal disputes. This case highlights the nuanced requirements for character protection in copyright law, emphasizing the need for depth beyond mere visual appeal.

Curated from 24-7 Press Release

blockchain registration record for this content
Advos

Advos

@advos