Ohio Law Firm Secures $300,000 Recovery in Underinsured Motorist Case Following T-Bone Collision
TL;DR
Piscitelli Law Firm secured a $300,000 recovery by litigating against a lowball $70,000 offer, demonstrating how aggressive legal action maximizes compensation from underinsured motorist coverage.
The firm recovered $300,000 by filing a $275,000 lawsuit after a $25,000 setoff from the at-fault driver's minimum coverage, overcoming an initial $70,000 UIM offer.
This $300,000 recovery for a 78-year-old injured in a T-bone collision ensures proper compensation for radial tunnel syndrome, protecting vulnerable individuals from underinsured drivers.
Radial tunnel syndrome, a painful nerve compression causing grip weakness, was among injuries in this 50 mph T-bone collision case that secured $300,000 through UIM coverage.
Found this article helpful?
Share it with your network and spread the knowledge!

The Piscitelli Law Firm secured a $300,000 total recovery for a 78-year-old individual injured in a 50 mph T-bone collision, demonstrating the critical role of underinsured motorist coverage and legal representation in insurance claim disputes. After the at-fault driver provided only Ohio's minimum $25,000 coverage, the firm pursued the client's $300,000 underinsured motorist policy, which is designed to compensate victims when responsible drivers lack adequate insurance.
The client sustained resolved soft-tissue trauma and radial tunnel syndrome, a painful condition caused by compression of the radial nerve in the upper forearm that leads to discomfort, weakened grip, and pain during rotation. Despite these injuries, the UIM insurance provider initially offered only $70,000, significantly below the available $275,000 coverage after the $25,000 setoff from the at-fault driver's payment.
"UIM coverage is designed to provide compensation when the at-fault driver is underinsured," stated Frank Piscitelli, Jr. "When the insurance company undervalued our client's claim, we pursued litigation and successfully obtained the full policy benefits." The firm filed a lawsuit for $275,000, and after several months of legal proceedings, the insurer disbursed the full amount, resulting in the total $300,000 recovery.
This case illustrates the substantial gap that can exist between initial insurance offers and actual policy benefits, particularly for older individuals who may face more severe consequences from similar injuries. The 78-year-old client had braced on the steering wheel prior to impact, which may have contributed to the specific nature of his injuries. The successful litigation outcome emphasizes that policyholders may need legal intervention to access the full coverage they've purchased, even when dealing with their own insurance providers.
The financial implications extend beyond this individual case, as insurance industry practices regarding claim valuation directly affect consumers who pay premiums for specific coverage levels. When insurers systematically undervalue claims, policyholders may not receive the protection they've purchased, creating financial vulnerability after accidents. More information about this case is available at https://getfrankgetjustice.com/result/300000-dollar-recovery-in-underinsured-motorist-case/.
This recovery highlights broader concerns about insurance adequacy in accident scenarios, particularly as medical costs continue to rise and minimum coverage requirements in many states, including Ohio's $25,000 limit, may prove insufficient for serious injuries. The case serves as a reminder for consumers to understand their insurance policies thoroughly and recognize that initial settlement offers may not reflect the true value of their claims or available coverage.
Curated from Press Services


